GUWAHATI: The Gauhati University (GU) has publicly rejected recent allegations that it imposed unreasonable conditions on students regarding examination form submissions, calling the claims “baseless and misleading.” The University’s rebuttal comes amid growing concern and debate among students and parents over what were described as restrictive or unclear procedures for filling in exam forms.
Our correspondent reports that the controversy began when a number of students and social-media posts alleged that the University demanded extra paperwork and imposed deadlines that would unfairly exclude certain candidates — particularly those from remote areas or with limited access to official channels. The criticism claimed that these requirements made it difficult for some students to register for upcoming semester examinations, effectively blocking their academic progress.
In an official statement issued by the University, administrators firmly rejected these assertions. “All rules and procedures regarding form-filling remain the same as previous semesters,” the statement read. “No additional condition has been imposed this year.” The administration clarified that the standard processes for form submission, fee payment, and eligibility verification are unchanged, and that ample information was provided to students through official notices and university communication platforms.
Our correspondent adds that the University emphasised its commitment to fairness and transparency. Officials pointed out that notifications about exam forms were published well in advance, and that students were given sufficient time to download the forms, fill them out, pay the requisite fees, and submit the documents either online or at designated counters. They stressed that support was available for students facing genuine difficulties, including those from remote districts who might struggle with internet connectivity or travel constraints.
Further, the University dismissed allegations of discriminatory practices or prejudice against students from particular backgrounds. “We do not and will not discriminate on the basis of region, social status or any other ground,” the statement said. “Our doors remain open to every eligible student.” According to administrators, the grievances were likely the result of confusion or misunderstanding of existing procedures — not the result of new restrictive policies.
Our correspondent reports that student representatives welcomed the clarification but urged consistent communication and perhaps the introduction of more flexible provisions for future exam cycles. “We appreciate that the University has addressed these allegations,” said a member of the GU Students’ Union. “But the fact that the issue surfaced indicates there is room to improve how guidelines are communicated, especially to students from rural or remote areas.”
Some parents and students who earlier claimed to have faced difficulties also reacted cautiously but noted that the response from the University offered much-needed reassurance. “We were worried because our friends from far-off districts were afraid they would miss exams,” said one parent. “Now that the University has clarified, we hope they will also offer extra support to those who couldn’t manage the form submission on time.”
Our correspondent adds that the University has advised any student who feels they have been unfairly disadvantaged or who encountered genuine hardship to reach out through official grievance channels. The administration reaffirmed that all valid cases will be examined sympathetically, in line with established norms and rules.
Educational experts and observers believe this episode underscores the challenges faced by institutions in ensuring equitable access in a diverse state such as Assam. Disparities in digital access, travel challenges for remote students, and socioeconomic divides can often amplify misunderstandings when administrative processes are not communicated clearly. The GU controversy has thus become a case study in the need for clarity, proactive outreach, and inclusive policies.
The University’s statement ended on a note of commitment: “Our objective remains to provide uninterrupted academic opportunities to each eligible student without bias or obstruction.” Many in the student community, while relieved, have also expressed hopes that the administration will follow through on its promise, and possibly streamline future processes to avoid confusion or unintended exclusion.
